Tag Archives: biodiversity

Yet another South African veterinarian arrested for Rhino Horn Crimes

A distinguished wildlife veterinarian in South Africa has been caught for unlawfully detaching the horns from 15 rhinos. Dr. Andre Charles Uys apparently dehorned the particular rhinos within the Maremani Game Reserve, situated in Limpopo Province.

Dr. Uys was already released on R10,000 (US $1,416) bail at the Musina Magistrate’s Court and is also scheduled to appear for a second time on March 18th.

The doctor is faced with a charge that includes breaking Section 57 (1) of the National Environment Management: Biodiversity Act No 10 of 2004 – An individual is prohibited from carrying out a restricted activity involved with a specimen associated with a listed endangered or protected species without having a permit granted with references to Chapter 7.

The particular public arrest was carried out as a result of the hard work of the National Wildlife Crime Reaction Unit, directed by the Hawks. At the present time, general public information and facts are unavailable with regards to the present whereabouts of the horns in addition to whether or not the horns have been confiscated by respective authorities.

Certainly not the first veterinarian associated with rhino horn criminal activity

This particular occurrence is certainly not the first time a veterinarian appears to have been suspected of rhino horn offences.

Last September, Dr. Karel Toet and Dr. Manie du Plessis associated with the Nylstroom animal clinic were actually detained in connection to a well known rhino horn syndicate, in conjunction with Dawie Groenewald (Out of Africa Adventurous Safaris).

The particular high-profile “Groenewald gang” is scheduled to appear once again in the court in April 2011, in order to deal with charges of assault, fraud, corruption, malicious damage to property, unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition, in addition to contravening the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act.

‘Insiders’ involved with unlawful rhino horn industry

An escalating volume of arrests with regard to rhino horn offences already have implicated “insiders” from within the South African conservation community, looking to take advantage of and cash in on the ignorance as well as misconceptions associated with the benefits of using rhino horn.

Currently there happens to be an in-depth investigation around this distressing subject matter – Are ‘Insiders’ Intentionally Fueling Demand for Illegal Rhino Horn?, which notes that nefarious business alliances, loophole abuse, private stockpile leakage, dehorning scams, and legalized trade speculation are exacerbating South Africa’s rhino crisis.

Already eight rhinos killed worldwide this year

2011 has already been off to a particular discouraging beginning.

When it comes to South Africa, the most up-to-date slaughtering of rhinos took place in KwaZulu-Natal. Previous to that, two rhinos had been murdered in Kruger National Park, a pregnant rhino ended up being slaughtered around the Hoedspruit area, in addition to another in close proximity to Musina. One more was slain in the Eastern Cape, within Kariega Game Reserve in the proximity of Kenton-on-Sea.

Globally, 1 rhino also has been murdered in Nepal in addition to one more in India, bringing the international death toll to eight since the beginning of this year.

During the course of 2010, 333 rhinos ended up being slaughtered in South Africa, just about tripling 2009’s total amount of 122.

Rhinocerous horn purchase prices ‘soar’ immediately after departing from Africa

Despite the fact that rhino poachers are generally believed to get paid approximately R25,000 for each and every kilogram when it comes to Mozambique, and only somewhere around R30,000 per horn in South Africa, the purchase price is without a doubt much more found in rhino horn consumer countries around the world.

Typical rhino horn weights are by and large determined by making use of three kilograms for black rhinos, and five and a half kilograms for white rhinos.

With the help of up-to-date forex rates in addition to average weights of white rhino horn, the more expensive Mozambique value of R25,000 per kilogram could quite possibly signify close to $20,000 US dollars (per horn) for murdering a rhino.

Having said that, the moment rhino horn actually leaves Africa, the purchase price soars.

When it comes to Vietnam, rhino horn possibly will without difficulty command USD $40, 000 per kilogram. The purchase price climbs even more significantly within China, to a number exceeding USD $60, 000 per kilogram (D. Anderson, TRAFFIC, pers. comm., 30 December 2010).

On going utilization of unlawful rhino horn in traditional ‘medicines’

At the root of the rhino catastrophe is most likely the persistent utilization of rhino horn in traditional Chinese medicine.

Unlawful rhino horn is actually extremely desired to be used in traditional medicines in China and Vietnam, even though rhino horn has long been thoroughly investigated and possesses absolutely no medicinal qualities.

Studies carried out by the wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC discovered that the majority of rhino horns going out of Southern Africa are increasingly being smuggled into China and Vietnam.

Dispersing Chinese footprint in Southern Africa

It has recently been observed the fact that the spreading Chinese presence inside Southern Africa seems to have positioned the actual demand for rhino horn perilously near to the supply, not to mention counter poaching studies already have linked the rise in rhino and elephant murders to a deluge of Chinese weapons in the area.

Abuse of CITES research loopholes

There are certainly additional fears that state-funded rhino horn use recommendations coming from China served as one of numerous reasons relating to the tremendous increase in rhino murders throughout Southern Africa.

Many of these proposals, which experts claim surfaced in 2008 and 2009, strongly encourage the utilization of rhino horn, and firmly advocates that the PRC government is trying to bypass CITES research provisions through process of blurring the lines between research and commercial trade in rhinos.

Source:buanews.gov.za, rhinoconservation.org, bushwarriors.wordpress.com, globeonlive.com, guardian.co.uk, csmonitor.com, belowthelion.co.za,


Frequently asked questions on water quality (part 5)

What defines the quality of water?

Water quality is an important parameter touching on all aspects of ecosystems and human well-being such as the health of a community, food to be produced, economic activities, ecosystem health and biodiversity. Therefore, water quality also is influential in determining human poverty, wealth and educational levels. From a management perspective, water quality is defined by its desired end use. Consequently, water for recreation, fishing, drinking, and habitat for aquatic organisms require higher levels of purity, whereas for hydropower, quality standards are much less important. For this reason, water quality takes on a broad de????inition as the ‘‘physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of water necessary to sustain desired water uses’’ (UN/ECE 1995). It needs to be noted that after its use water usually returns back to the hydrological system and if left untreated can severely affect the environment.

What is the state of water quality on our planet?

Worldwide water quality is declining mainly due to human activities. Increasing population growth, rapid urbanization, discharge of new pathogens and new chemicals from industries and invasive species are key factors that contribute to the deterioration of water quality. In addition, climate change will further affect water quality. Major risks are the lack of water quality data and monitoring worldwide as well as lack of knowledge about the potential impact of natural and anthropogenic pollutants on the environment and on water quality. The lack of prioritization of water quality in many countries has resulted in decreased allocation of resources, weak institutions and lack of coordination in addressing water quality challenges.

How do population growth, urbanization and industrial production affect water quality?

Deterioration of water quality occurs when existing municipal and industrial water treatment and/or sanitation infrastructure is overloaded or the relevant infrastructure is absent or outdated and waste and waste water are discharged directly into the environment from where they find their way into surface or groundwater. Enhancing and expanding infrastructure can be very costly and therefore in general is not keeping up with rapid development. Waste water management therefore is emerging as a major global challenge. In addition agricultural and industrial production result in new pollution problems that have become one of the biggest challenges facing water resources in many parts of the world.

Water quality can be affected by organic loading (e.g. sewage), pathogens including viruses in waste streams from humans and domesticated animals, agricultural runoff and human wastes loaded with nutrients (e.g. nitrates and phosphates) that give rise to eutrophication and oxygen stress in waterways, salinization from irrigation and water diversions, heavy metals, oil pollution, synthetic and persistent engineered chemicals (e.g. plastics and pesticides), medical drug residues and hormone mimetics and their by-products, radioactive pollution, and even thermal pollution from industrial cooling and reservoir operations.

Water quality degradation can result in the deterioration of the functioning of ecosystems and can lead to abrupt and nonlinear changes. Once certain thresholds are exceeded, the system may change to a very different state and collapse. For example, excessive nutrient loading in freshwater and coastal ecosystems can cause abrupt and extensive changes, possibly leading to algal blooms and oxygen-depletion which makes most animal life impossible.

How does climate change influence water quality?

Climate change and in particular increasing temperatures and changes in hydrological patterns such as droughts and floods will affect water quality and exacerbate water pollution from sediments, nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, pathogens, pesticides and salt, as well as thermal pollution. Further, sea-level rise is projected to extend areas of salinisation of groundwater and estuaries and thereby impacting the availability of freshwater for humans and ecosystems in coastal areas. Gaps still exist in the knowledge about the impacts of climate change on water, especially its quality. Although observational data are required for adaptive management, many observational networks are shrinking. There is a need to improve the understanding and modelling of climate changes with respect to the hydrological cycle at scales that is relevant to decision-making. Information about water-related climate change impacts is inadequate, particularly regarding water quality, aquatic ecosystems and groundwater.

How can water quality be sustained? How can polluted water be treated or purified?

Both in terms of sustainability as well as of investment and affordability, prevention should be the preferred option. Prevention of water pollution must therefore be the first priority to sustain water quality. The other two options are treatment and restoration. While treatment in some cases is necessary in natural environments due to contamination (pollution caused by environmental influences, e.g. arsenic), it usually becomes more complex when tackling pollution caused by human activities. Finally, restoration of water quality that has been degraded usually is expensive, and more costly than prevention since the rehabilitation of a degraded ecosystem actually means to reestablish the natural environment in all its complexity to the original one. Water purification is a service that ecosystems provide, through recycling nutrients, trapping silt, and breaking down waste. Wetlands, for example, can filter out high level of nutrients and toxic substances. On the other hand, ecosystems themselves depend on the availability of adequate water quality.

How does water quality affect human health?

Sufficient quality of water is critical to ensure a healthy environment and human health. The basic requirement per person per day is 20 to 40 liters of water free from harmful contaminants and pathogens for the purposes of drinking and sanitation, rising to 50 liters when bathing and kitchen needs are considered. In many countries, however, the amount of water required daily for drinking and sanitation is not provided in the required quality. Developing countries undergoing rapid urbanization suffer from lack of sewage treatment facilities which results in the contamination of drinking water, thus it becomes a major cause of illness (which impacts poverty and education) and death. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 4 billion cases of diarrhea each year in addition to millions of other cases of illness are associated with lack of access to water that is safe for human consumption. Per year 2.2 million people die as a result of diarrhea most of them are children under the age of five. Human health is severely impacted by water-related diseases (waterborne, water-washed, water-based, and water-related vector-borne infections) as well as by chemical pollution discharged  to water.

Despite progressive improvement in the provision of sanitation since 1990, providing safe water and sanitation to large parts of the human population remains a challenge. Today, 1.1 billion people around the world still lack access to improved water supply and more than 2.6 billion people lack access to improved sanitation. The most significant gaps exist in sub-Saharan Africa, then to a lesser extent in Western Asia and Eurasia. Improvements in sanitation have been far less in rural areas than in urban areas, and there has been even a decline in the provision of sanitation services in rural areas of Oceania and the former Soviet Union.

Are there any international agreements regarding water quality?

There are no global binding environmental agreements obliging states to safeguard water resources against pollution as this is a national government responsibility. The 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, which provides that international watercourses shall be used balancing the interests of the watercourse States concerned and the adequate protection of the watercourse, has not entered into force yet. However, the importance of protecting freshwater resources has been recognized in international non-binding instruments such as Agenda 21, adopted in 1992 by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. In particular, Agenda 21’s Chapter 18 on the Protection of the Quality and Supply of Freshwater Resources: Application of Integrated Approaches to the Development, Management and Use of Water Resources sets as its general objective “to make certain that adequate supplies of water of good quality are maintained for the entire population of this planet, while preserving the hydrological, biological and chemical functions of ecosystems, adapting human activities within the capacity limits of nature and combating vectors of water-related diseases.”

Concerning groundwater resources, in December 2008 the UN General Assembly (UNGA) adopted the Resolution (A/RES/63/124) on the ‘Law of Transboundary Aquifers’. Through this resolution the UNGA encourages aquifer states to make appropriate bilateral or regional arrangements for the sustainable management of their transboundary aquifers, taking into account the provisions contained in the annexed draft articles.

At the regional level, there are a number of agreements which address the issue of water quality. Of particular importance are the 1992 UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes and the 2000 Revised Protocol on Shared Watercourses in the Southern African Development Community (SADC).

The 2007 Resolution on Forests and Water within the FOREST EUROPE policy process is of particular relevance in the pan-European region. FOREST EUROPE is the pan-European policy process for the sustainable management of the continent’s forests. The resolution emphasises the vital role of sustainable forest management in protecting water quality and promoting overall watershed management. It was endorsed by the responsible ministers of the 46 participating FOREST EUROPE countries and the EU at the 5th Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. The countries committed themselves to maintaining and enhancing the water and soil protection functions of forests, as well as those for mitigating local water-related natural disasters, through sustainable forest management, including the use of public and private partnerships. They stressed the importance of developing, improving and co-ordinating policies for forest and water resource management.

The European Union has established a framework for Community action in the field of water policy in the EU Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000). The primary objective of the directive is to prevent further water deterioration and to implement the necessary measures to achieve “good water status” in all EU waters by 2015. The criteria for determining what constitutes “good” water status is assessed on the basis of detailed qualitative and quantitative factors, such as abundance of aquatic flora and fauna, the level of salinity, the quantity and dynamics of water flow, nutrient concentrations, and so on. Specific requirements apply to drinking water, to pollution, and to the management of aquifers, among others.

A great number of agreements concerning specific river/lake basins have been concluded by relevant riparian countries to establish an institutional and legal framework for the joint management and sustainable use of the shared resource, e.g. the International Joint Commission of Canada and the United States.

What water quality issues are directly related to unsustainable bioenergy production?

As the nexus between bioenergy and water has been receiving more attention in the scientific and political spheres, it has become evident that unsustainable bioenergy production has the potential to contribute to worsening water quality. Like other agricultural cultivation processes, if farming systems involve the heavy application of agro-chemicals, run-off from these fertilizers (e.g. nutrients like nitrates and phosphorous) and pesticides can adversely affect downstream aquatic ecosystems and their services as well as downstream human activities and uses. Depending on the specific bioenergy system, the wastewater from conversion processes can also affect the quality of surface/ ground water. Discharge water from bioenergy processing facilities if treated improperly, for example, can deteriorate water quality. Although more research needs to be undertaken on this nexus, it is evident that improved farm and plant-level practices can reduce the risk to water quality.

Source: worldwaterday2010.info


Water quality facts and statistics (part 4)


Global water pollution

? Every day, 2 million tons of sewage and industrial and agricultural waste are discharged into the world’s water. (UN WWAP 2003)
? The UN estimates that the amount of wastewater “produced” annually is about 1,500 km3. (UN WWAP 2003)

Human waste

? Lack of adequate sanitation contaminates watercourses worldwide and is one of the most significant forms of water pollution. Worldwide, 2.5 billion people live without adequate sanitation. (UNICEF WHO 2008)
? 70% of the people who lack sanitation worldwide, i.e. 1.8 billion people, live in Asia. (UNICEF WHO 2008)
? Sub-Saharan Africa is the slowest of the world’s regions to achieve improved sanitation: only 31% of residents had access to improved sanitation in 2006. (UNICEF WHO 2008)
? 18% of the world’s population, or 1.2 billion people (1 out of 3 in rural areas), defecate in the open. Open defecation significantly compromises quality in nearby water bodies and poses an extreme human health risk. (UNICEF WHO 2008)
? In Southern Asia, 63% of rural people – 778 million people – practice open defecation. (UNICEF WHO 2008)

Human health impacts

? Worldwide, infectious diseases such as waterborne diseases are the number one killer of children under five years old. More people die from unsafe water annually than from all forms of violence, including war. (WHO 2002)
? Unsafe or inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene cause approximately 3.1% of all deaths worldwide and 3.7 % of DALYs (disability adjusted life years) worldwide. (WHO 2002)
? Unsafe water causes 4 billion cases of diarrhoea each year, and results in 2.2 million deaths, mostly of children under five. This means that 15% of child deaths each year are attributable to diarrhoea – a child dying every 15 seconds. In India alone, the single largest cause of ill health and death among children is diarrhoea, which kills nearly half a million children each year. (WHO and UNICEF 2000)

Impacts on the environment

? There has been a widespread decline in biological health in inland (non-coastal) waters. Globally, 24% of mammals and 12% of birds connected to inland waters are considered threatened. (UN WWAP 2003)
? In some regions, like the Mediterranean and Madagascar and other island groups in the western Indian Ocean, more than 50% of native freshwater fish species are at risk of extinction, and nearly one-third of the world’s amphibians are at risk of extinction. (Vié et al. 2009)
? Freshwater species have faced an estimated extinction rate five times greater than that of terrestrial species. (Ricciardi and Rasmussen 1999)
? Freshwater ecosystems sustain a large number of identified species, including a quarter of known vertebrates. Such systems provide more than US$75 billion in goods and ecosystem services for people, but are increasingly threatened by a host of water quality problems. (Vié et al. 2009)

Drinking water quality

? Point-of- use drinking water treatment through chlorine and safe storage of water could result in 122.2 million avoided DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Years, a measure of morbidity), at a total cost of US$ 11.4 billion. (UN WWAP 2003)
? Nearly 70 million people living in Bangladesh are exposed to groundwater with arsenic above WHO recommended limits of 10 ug/L. (UN WWAP 2009)
? Naturally occurring arsenic pollution in groundwater now affects nearly 140 million people in 70 countries on all continents. (UN WWAP 2009)

Costs and benefits of water quality

? With the Millennium Development Goals, the international community committed to halving the proportion of people without access to safe water and sanitation by 2015. Meeting this goal would mean an extra 322 million working days per year gained, at a value of nearly US$ 750 million (SIWI 2005), and an annual health sector cost saving of US$ 7 billion. Overall, the total economic benefits of meeting this MDG target are estimated at US$ 84 billion. (SIWI 2005)
? Poor countries with access to clean water and sanitation services experienced faster economic growth than those without: one study found the annual economic growth rate was 3.7 % among poor countries with better access to improved water and sanitation services, while similarly poor countries without access had an annual growth of just 0.1 %. (Sachs 2001)
? Sanitation and drinking water investments
have high rates of return: for every $1 invested, there is a projected $3-$34 economic development return. (UN WWAP 2009)
? Economic losses, due to the lack of water and sanitation in Africa as a result of the mortality and morbidity impacts, are estimated at $28.4 billion or about 5% of GDP. (UN WWAP 2009)

Pollution from industry and mining

? 70% of untreated industrial wastes in developing countries are disposed into water where they contaminate existing water supplies. (UN-Water 2009)
? An estimated 500,000 abandoned mines in the U.S. will cost $20 billion in management and remediation of pollution; many of these sites will require management in perpetuity. (Septoff 2006)
? In the U.S. state of Colorado alone, some 23,000 abandoned mines have polluted 2,300 km of streams. (Banks, et al. 1997)
? Chlorinated solvents were found in 30 %  of groundwater supplies in 15 Japanese cities, sometimes ending up as much as 10 km from the source of pollution. (UNEP 1996)
? Roughly one unit of mercury is emitted into the environment for every unit of gold produced by small-scale miners. A total of as much as 1000 tons of mercury is emitted each year. (UNEP/GRIDArendal 2004)

Pollution from agriculture

? In a comparison of domestic, industrial, and agricultural sources of pollution from the coastal zone of Mediterranean countries, agriculture was the leading source of phosphorus compounds and sediment. (UNEP 1996) Nutrient enrichment, most often associated with nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural runoff, can deplete oxygen levels and eliminate species with higher oxygen requirements, affecting the structure and diversity of ecosystems.
? Nitrate1 is the most common chemical contaminant in the world’s groundwater aquifers. (Spalding and Exner, 1993) Mean nitrate levels have risen globally by an estimated 36% in global waterways since 1990, with the most dramatic
increases seen in the Eastern Mediterranean and Africa, where nitrate contamination has more than doubled. (GEMS 2004)
? According to various surveys in India and
Africa, 20-50% of wells contain nitrate1 levels greater than 50 milligrams/litre and in some cases, as high as several hundred milligrams per litre. (cited in FAO 1996)

Groundwater impacts

? In Chennai, India, over-extraction of groundwater has resulted in saline groundwater nearly 10 km inland from the sea and similar problems can be found in populated coastal areas around the world. (UNEP 1996)

Infrastructure affects water quality

? 60 % of the world’s 227 biggest rivers have interrupted stream flows due to dams and other infrastructure. Interruptions in stream-flow dramatically decrease sediment and nutrient transport to downstream stretches, reducing water quality and impairing

Source: worldwaterday2010.info


How to protect water quality (part 3)

How to protect water quality

You can make a difference

Why care?

Safeguarding the world’s water quality is critical for human health and the health of our ecosystems. Our water quality depends on the commitment of individuals, communities and governments.

What can you do?

Individuals can make a difference by spreading awareness about the connections between water quality and health, and advocating for better services and better water-protection laws and policies at community, regional, and national   levels.
We need action at all levels to:

Prevent pollution

Treat what we dispose of into waterways

Restore polluted waterways

• We can work on community campaigns to spread awareness about the impact of refuse disposal and the lack of safe sanitation on water quality and health.
• Awareness can lead to better management of and disposal of solid and human waste and chemical and industrial waste into waterways, as well as treating wastes before they go into waterways.
• Water-quality protection means developing, promoting, and educating citizens to campaign for safe and cost-effective ways of treating drinking water before consumption.
• Tailor made messages and information for communities in areas without sewage collection can help people make informed decisions and determine the best strategies to avoid contaminating local water sources. This means, for example, avoiding urinating
or defecating in or near the water, building toilets/sites for waste downhill from wells to reduce risks of contaminating groundwater, employing household water treatment and safe storage techniques and buying least polluting products and services.
• Individuals can also participate in restoration organizations and activities to learn and then educate others in the community and advocate for better water-quality solutions: Some solutions include “Low Impact Development” and protecting natural areas.


For residents of urban and suburban areas

As our cities and suburbs grow, more and more surface area is impervious, meaning that water doesn’t soak in, it runs off. As it runs off, more and more pollutants are carried into waterways including oil, grease, and toxic chemicals from motor vehicles, pesticides and fertilizers from lawns and gardens, waste from pets and sewers, chemical seepage, trash and more

• Decrease polluted runoff by replacing paved surfaces, where possible, with porous pavement materials and plantings (especially native plants).
• Sweep, don’t hose down, driveways, sidewalks, gutters, and patios.
• Direct rainwater to lawns and gardens or rainwater catchment.
• Pick up after your pet. Pet waste is raw sewage.
• Store and dispose of household chemicals properly. Take paints, solvents, cleaners, and pesticides to household hazardous collection sites where available.
• Check cars for fluid leaks and recycle motor oil. Find a “green” car wash that recycles wastewater and avoid hosing down cars in driveways and on streets.
• Don’t flush garbage down the toilet.
• Never pour anything down the storm drains and don’t litter! Everything you see on the streets can be carried into our waterways.
• On lawn and garden areas, use fertilizers sparingly and avoid harmful pesticides.
• Compost, don’t trash, yard and garden clippings.
• Weigh in on city planning! Vote for ordinances and plans that require “Low Impact Development” strategies for new growth and protect natural areas.
• Volunteer for restoration organizations and activities and help educate the community on water quality solutions.


For residents of rural and agricultural areas

Sediment that is washed off from fields is one of the largest sources of agricultural water pollution, as this soil runoff often contains harmful pesticides and chemical contaminants. Runoff from fertilizer adds nitrogen and phosphorous to waterways, and these extra nutrients can lead to algae growth that depletes oxygen in the water and harms the ecosystem.

• Use soil erosion control techniques and implement nutrient management plans on agricultural land to reduce excess and reduce runoff that contaminates waterways.
• Use Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques (which include biological pest control) to minimize pesticide impacts on waterways.
• Use the least – and least toxic – applications to protect groundwater, because fertilizers and pesticides used to grow crops may leach through soils and contaminate groundwater supplies.
• Control farm animal access to water resources by constructing fences or bushes and trees to protect water quality. Livestock eat the vegetation that protects stream banks, their hooves can cause further erosion, and their waste degrades water quality.
• Maintain your septic system and have it inspected and pumped every 2-5 years. Keep household hazardous wastes out of it.
• Remember that roots from trees and shrubs can damage the septic system, so keep plantings away from the area.
• Make use of “Green infrastructure” to improve both urban and rural waters: use soil, trees, plants, wetlands, and open space to reduce total runoff and treat what is produced through capture and reuse or infiltration of rainwater.
• Avoid draining, filling and damaging wetland ecosystems. Wetlands act as a natural water treatment and purification systems.
• Sustainably manage forests by avoiding clear cutting to maintain their functions such as storing water and regulating flow.
• Be involved and speak out! Join – or start –a local watershed coalition, stream or river protection group or conservation organization


For residents without sewerage systems

Good practices can help contain pollution and keep water safer. Sharing the information and getting a community involved is one of the best ways to begin taking on the water-quality challenge. An organized community can help direct the attention of policymakers to invest in solutions.

• Urinate or defecate in safe distance from water sources to prevent contamination of the water with germs/ bacteria.
• Use safe sanitation solutions to keep human waste away from water. This waste also needs to be treated before it affects waterways.
• Water used for cleaning hands and bodies after defecating should never be dumped into lakes and streams, but rather into a toilet or waste pit (20 meters from any surface water, wells, or springs).
• Build toilets/sites for waste downhill from nearby wells to reduce the risk of contaminating the groundwater.
• Use fertilizers and pesticides in limited amounts to help to keep them from entering waterways.
• Protect the area around a spring source with a fence to help keep animals out. A drainage ditch from the source helps avoid pooling and mud where germs can thrive.
• Use clean, narrow necked containers to collect water to help keep the water safer. If needed, treat water before drinking by using chlorine, UV disinfection, or boiling.
• Spread the word and make sure everyone in your community knows and understands how to help keep water sources safe.
• Many problems can be solved through community organizations or other partnerships.

Source: worldwaterday2010.info


The Secretary-General message on World Water Day

Water is the source of life and the link that binds all living beings on this planet. It is connected directly to all our United Nations goals: improved maternal and child health and life expectancy, women’s empowerment, food security, sustainable development and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Recognition of these links led to the declaration of 2005-2015 as the International Decade for Action “Water for Life”.

Our indispensable water resources have proven themselves to be greatly resilient, but they are increasingly vulnerable and threatened. Our growing population’s need for water for food, raw materials and energy is increasingly competing with nature’s own demands for water to sustain already imperiled ecosystems and the services on which we depend. Day after day, we pour millions of tons of untreated sewage and industrial and agricultural wastes into the world’s water systems. Clean water has become scarce and will become even scarcer with the onset of climate change. And the poor continue to suffer first and most from pollution, water shortages and the lack of adequate sanitation.

The theme of this year’s World Water Day, “Clean Water for a Healthy World”, emphasizes that both the quality and the quantity of water resources are at risk. More people die from unsafe water than from all forms of violence, including war. These deaths are an affront to our common humanity, and undermine the efforts of many countries to achieve their development potential.

The world has the know-how to solve these challenges and become better stewards of our water resources. Water is central to all our development goals. As we mark the mid-point of the International Decade for Action, and look forward to this year’s MDG Summit, let us protect and sustainably manage our waters for the poor, the vulnerable and for all life on Earth.

Source: worldwaterday2010.info